Taman Fajar 10 Farmhouse Destroyed By Local Authority.

Report in Chinese:


威省市局出动百人 强拆高渊燕屋
二零零七年十二月十三日 晚上八时三十一分

http://www.kwongwah.com.my/news/2007/12/13/104.html


（威南13日讯）威省市政局周四早上出动逾百名执法人员，用铲泥机拆毁繁荣园10间燕屋及剪开另8间燕屋之铁门，取走8套诱燕音响系统。


该局是于周四早上9时派出执法人员，以有关燕屋发出噪音干扰民居，和涉及违规扩建为由，用强硬手段拆毁这些燕屋。


马振图：已申请执照及呈图测


10间遭拆毁之燕屋皆属于顺利豪燕屋设计顾问公司所拥有，股东马振图接受传媒访问时指出，这些燕屋都依程序，也有申请养燕执照，图测也呈交了、费用也缴
付了，每间都付5000余令吉费用，不知为何当局会拆毁。他说，其实这10间燕屋还在进行装修，未操作。如今当局之行动导致公司损失约50万令吉，会征
询律师意见来采取法律行动。


他说，在今年10月3日接获威省市政局的获传票后，他有呈函向当局解释，但在今日还遭拆毁。


行动党高渊成功花园支部主席陈明发闻讯到场代表养燕业者向执法官员交涉，但失败。


他向传媒说，当局以强硬手段来拆毁燕屋，对业者非常不公平，政府应寻双赢之良策来解决问题。


他希望该花园区之约70间燕屋业者成立公会来捍卫本身权益，与解决面对传票之问题。


公正党高渊国会选区竞选策略主任陈智铭也赶到现场，他发言说，在11月时，该区之养燕业者都接到传票，他曾往威省市政局了解有关状况，并向当局要求给予
3个星期的通融，让他会见有关养燕业者及投诉之居民，让各造达致共识来缔造双赢局面。他也有吁请受影响的居民在11月29日下午2时30分起前往公正党
高渊行动中心一同商讨问题，可惜却无人出席。


他说，迄今只有7名业者联络他，因此希望威南区的养燕者能尽快联络陈朝升016-4257111或李君019-3260116，以安排养燕业者举行座谈
会来寻求良策。


威省市政局之拆毁燕屋行动令高渊区之养燕业者大感惊慌，很多业者赶到现场探听消息，见执法人员拆毁10间后收队，才放下心中大石。


部份业者表示，他们皆依规申请养燕准证，但近来接获该局发予红色传票限令3天拆除违规建筑之燕屋，都指该局此举非常不公道，也令他们感到混淆及毫无保
障。


威省市政局所发出的传票是指，业者在未获得当局之书面批准下，擅自进行室内扩建，因此触犯地方政府1974年道路、沟渠与建筑物法令之第70条文。传票
是于11月19日发出，限令接获传票者须在3天内拆除违规室内扩建，否则将面对每天250令吉之罚款，或面对市政局派员前来拆除时必须承担折除行动之费
用及诉讼费。威省市政局所定下的诱燕基本的一些条规是，诱燕音响播放时间限在早上7时至晚上7时，不可超过40分贝，要朝天60度的角度，以及要保持燕
屋的清洁及卫生等等。

Translated using Google Translator:



At 20:31 on December 13, 2007
Http://www.kwongwah.com.my/news/2007/12/13/104.html


Penang provincial and municipal councils Thursday morning sent more than 100 law enforcement personnel, the demolition of mud with shovels prosperity Park 10-swiftlet estates and cut another eight birdhouse steel doors, removed eight sets lured swiftlets audio system.


It was Thursday morning 9:00 sent law enforcement officers to the Birdhouse noise interference residential housing, and expansion of irregularities involving the ground, with tough measures in the demolition of these birdhouses.

Ten were both demolished houses belonging to the smooth Yan Hao housing design consultancy owned by Ma Zhengang map shareholders.

When interviewed by the media that these houses are in accordance with birdhouse procedures, birdhouse also apply for licenses, also plans submitted to the test, costs also pay.

Paid, each have to pay 50 ringgit costs, I do not know why the authorities will be demolished. He said the fact that 10-bird housing is still under renovation, did not operate. Now the company's action led to the loss of about 500,000 ringgit, will levy The views of lawyers to take legal action.

He said, this year on October 3 received by the Council of Prai provinces summons after a letter he had explained to the authorities, but also was demolished today.

Action Party successful high-Yuan Garden branch of hearing this, President Chen arrived at the scene on behalf of the Birdhouse industry representations to the law enforcement officials, but failed.

He told the media that the authorities using a tough swiftlet means to demolish houses, the industry is very unfair, the government should find a win-win solution to the problem.

He hoped that the garden area of about 70-swiftlet estate industry, have formed associations to defend their interests, and solve the problems facing the summons.

Justice Party Congress high-yuan Chen Zhiming, director of the constituency campaign strategy also arrived on the scene, he said in his speech, in November, the area of custody Yan industry received a summons, he Granville provincial and municipal councils have to understand the situation, and Administration request for a

Three weeks of accommodation, so that he met with the Birdhouse industry and complaints of residents to allow building to reach a consensus to create a win-win situation.

He also appealed to the affected residents in at 14:30 on November 29, 1997 at Justice Party High-yuan Action Center to discuss issues Unfortunately, no one attended.

He said that so far only seven industry contact him, I hope威南the custody Yan Chen Zhaoyuan can contact or 016-4257111 or Li Junru 019-3260116 to arrange custody Birdhouse industry forum held council to seek ways.

Wai Yan provincial and municipal councils of the demolition of housing orders high-Yuan Yang Yan districts are greatly alarmed industry, many businesses rushed to the scene to get information, see law enforcement officers dismantled 10 after admission teams, only lay down their hearts boulder.

Some industry said they皆依regulation Yang Yan permit applications, but it recently received to the red hair ordering three days removed summons illegal construction of the Yan housing, it means it is very unfair, but also make them feel confused There is no security and
Impaired.

Granville issued by the provincial and municipal councils summons means that the industry in the absence of a written approval by the authorities, without indoor extension, committing local governments in 1974 roads, drains and buildings Act section 70 provisions.

Summons Is in the November 19 issue, insisting that the summons should be received in three days removed irregularities indoor extension, or they will face a fine day 250 ringgit, or face removal of the Urban Council to be sent to the discount in addition to action fees Use and litigation costs.

Granville set by the provincial and municipal councils Yan lured some of the basic rules and regulations, the lure swiftlet audio playback is limited from 7 am to 19:00, not more than 40 db, the direction of external tweeters to be 60 degrees angle, as well as to maintain birdhouse cleanliness and hygiene and so on.